Navigate Up
Sign In
User Login


Translating Coastal Flood Hazard Modeling Results into Floodplain Mapping
Krista Conner
FEMA coastal flood hazard mapping under CCAMP follows guidelines set forth in FEMA’s Final Draft Guidelines for Coastal Flood Hazard Analysis and Mapping for the Pacific Coast of the United States (2005). This article summarizes some of the important considerations that go into coastal floodplain mapping. 
Coastal flood hazards often include both elevated water levels and storm-induced wave action.  Elevated water levels can inundate low-lying areas and allow larger waves to reach beyond the shoreline.  The primary wave hazards evaluated in a FEMA coastal flood hazard study are wave runup and overland wave propagation
Wave runup is the dominant wave hazard along shorelines with steep terrain, including natural features such as coastal bluffs and dunes, and engineered structures such as revetments, levees and flood walls.  Wave runup occurs when waves break against the shore and water rushes up the steep shoreline.  If the crest elevation of the feature or structure is relatively low, the wave runup can exceed the crest resulting in overtopping (see Figure 1 below).  The primary characteristics of a study area that impact wave runup results are incident wave conditions, shoreline slope, and the crest elevation of the shoreline feature or structure.
Overland wave propagation occurs when elevated water levels, often referred to as the stillwater elevation (SWEL), inundate normally dry land and waves are able to propagate farther inland.  Analysis of overland wave propagation evaluates how wave energy changes as the waves propagate inland and are attenuated by obstructions, such as vegetation and buildings, or augmented by wind energy over open water fetches, such as ponds or lagoons.  The primary characteristics of a study area that impact overland wave propagation results are incident wave conditions, depth of inundation, and density of obstructions.
CB 4_Coastal Hazard Modeling Photo 2.JPG
Figure 1. Wave runup and over topping
Once complete, the results of the coastal flood hazard assessment are translated into floodplain mapping that includes base flood elevations (BFEs) and flood zone hazard designations such as VE and AE Zones.  VE Zones are coastal high hazard areas where wave action and/or high-velocity water can cause structural damage during the 1-percent-annual-chance flood.  AE Zones are areas with less hazardous wave action and/or areas of inundation. 
 CB 4_Coastal Hazard Modeling Photo 3.JPG
Figure 2. Innundation and overland wave propagation
Reaches of shoreline where wave runup is the dominant wave hazard are mapped with shore-perpendicular flood zone break lines separating segments of shoreline with differing runup elevations.  The zone break lines are located at changes in the slope of the ground and orientation of the shoreline.  The BFE for a runup reach is the 1-percent-annual-chance wave runup elevation.  The flood zone designation of Zone VE or Zone AE is based on the magnitude of wave runup above the stillwater level.  A VE Zone is mapped for transects with runup heights greater than or equal to 3 feet; an AE Zone is mapped for transects with runup heights less than 3 feet.  The floodplain is typically narrow with a single flood zone designation and BFE for each transect. 
Overland wave propagation is typically mapped with zone break lines that are approximately shore parallel and that follow ground topography.  The BFE in areas of overland wave propagation is the wave crest elevation, or in areas of inundation with minimal wave action, the BFE is based on the 1-percent- annual-chance stillwater elevation.  Zone VE is mapped for areas with wave heights greater than or equal to 3 feet; Zone AE is mapped for areas with wave heights less than 3 feet.  The floodplain is typically broad with changes in zone designation and BFEs along the transect.
BFEs in coastal high hazard areas are shown as whole foot values on FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps.  A single BFE is shown for each area bounded by the zone breaklines.  Although the 1-percent-annual-chance water surface elevation can vary between 0.5 feet higher and 0.5 feet lower than the whole foot BFE with the bounded area, FEMA considers the whole foot value to be valid for enforcement of community floodplain management regulations and for flood insurance policy rating purposes.
The figure below is an example of overland wave propagation and wave runup mapping (from draft Marin County, San Francisco Bay Study).

 Coastal Beat Story Archive

collapse Year : 2012 ‎(7)
<a href=''>Risk Map Local</a>
<a href=''>FEMA Leverages LiDAR</a>
<a href=''>FEMA’s CCAMP Studies and Our Coast, Our Future</a>
<a href=''>Region IX to Conduct First Flood Risk Review Meeting for CCAMP</a>
collapse Year : 2013 ‎(19)
<a href=''>FEMA Partners with Oceanweather and Scripps Institution of Oceanography to Bring Modeling Expertise to CCAMP OPC Study</a>
<a href=''>FEMA Region IX Holds Meetings for the California Coastal Analysis and Mapping Project / Open Pacific Coast Study</a>
<a href=''>Primary Frontal Dune Coastal High Hazard Area Mapping Requirements</a>
<a href=''>FEMA Holds South Bay Workshop to Kick-off Detailed Analysis in the South Bay Counties</a>
<a href=''>Translating Coastal Flood Hazard Modeling Results into Floodplain Mapping</a>
<a href=''>Terrain Modeling in FEMA’s California Coastal Flood Studies</a>
<a href=''>Join FEMA’s Community Rating System Program Using California’s Statewide Floodplain Management Activities</a>
<a href=''>Coastal Flood Processes Along the California Coast</a>
<a href=''>FEMA’s Annual Risk Awareness Survey: Findings from Previous Surveys and the Focus for the 2013 Survey</a>
collapse Year : 2014 ‎(9)
<a href=''>E386 Residential Coastal Construction</a>
<a href=''>Engaging Stakeholders to Help Communicate Impacts of BW-12</a>
<a href=''></a>
<a href=''>California Coastal Storm History Part Two – Ventura County</a>
<a href=''>Redelineation: What does it mean for me?</a>
collapse Year : 2015 ‎(2)
<a href=''>FEMA increases community access to draft floodplain mapping data </a>
collapse Year : 2016 ‎(6)
<a href=''></a>
1 - 40Next

 Other Stories

expand Arizona
Educating Maricopa County on the Power of Water,
Discovery Process, Thursday, February 23, 2012
expand California
Discovery Process, Thursday, March 1, 2012
NFIP Substantial Improvement and Substantial Damage Course, Wednesday, August 29, 2012
Santa Barbara County and Incorporated Areas Countywide Flood Insurance Rate Map,
Join FEMA’s Community Rating System Program Using California’s Statewide Floodplain Management Activities,
expand Coastal Studies
Discovery Process, Tuesday, January 10, 2012
Betty the Prepared Dog, Saturday, April 28, 2012
expand Hawaii
Tsunami: Learning from Experience in Hawaii,
Public Outreach Meeting for FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map, Wednesday, August 8, 2012
expand Nevada
Clark County Flood Facts,
expand Region Wide
Be Prepared for a Flooding Event in your Community Today!,
Watershed University , Friday, June 1, 2012
Know Your Line: Be Flood Aware, Thursday, May 2, 2013
1 - 30 Next
  • The Summary of Map Actions (SOMA) Report: SOMAs Deciphered

    Many community officials and floodplain managers are called upon to review a Summary of Map Actions (SOMA) report, but how familiar are you with this document, and the process of developing it? Did you know that the ability to revise or amend effective Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panels is always available? Revisions and amendments to flood hazard information may be accomplished through FEMA’s Letter of Map Change (LOMC) process, without having to re-publish the FIRM. When a Flood Insurance Study (FIS) update or restudy requires a revised FIRM panel to be re-published, the existing LOMCs that applied to the old effective FIRM panels are superseded by the newly effective FIRM panels, and LOMCs that have remained valid are revalidated. As part of a map revision, FEMA publishes a Preliminary and Final SOMA report. The SOMA records a complete list of all previously issued LOMCs, and their valid or superseded status, for each community affected by revised FIRM panels. The SOMA assists community officials in maintaining the most up-to-date information on their community’s FIRMs. (Read more…)

  • Flood Insurance Rate Maps and Flood Insurance Studies: From Preliminary to Effective

    ​FEMA flood hazard maps inform communities about the local flood risk. Flood hazard mapping is an important part of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), as FEMA regulatory products provide the basis for regulating development and determining flood insurance requirements under the NFIP regulations. FEMA maintains and updates regulatory flood hazard data through Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) and Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports.

    Following the data acquisition and data development phases of the flood insurance study process, FEMA distributes one set of the preliminary FIRM panels, the preliminary FIS Report, and the preliminary Summary of Map Actions (SOMA) to community CEOs. FEMA also posts PDF versions of the preliminary FIRM panels and FIS Report, as well as the DFIRM database containing the GIS shapefiles, to the Map Service Center (MSC), where they are available for public download. (The preliminary FIRM panels and the preliminary DFIRM database are archived on the MSC when the panels, FIS report, and database become effective.) The steps that follow, referred to as the post-preliminary process, include the public comment and appeal period, community and public meetings, the Letter of Final Determination, and community adoption/compliance requirements. 
    From July 2015 through November 2015, FEMA distributed preliminary data to ten coastal counties as part of the Open Pacific Coast Study and three counties as part of the San Francisco Bay Area Coastal Study. For more information about what goes into a flood map, go to this infographic on FEMA’s website. (Read more…)

View RSS feed

Powered by BakerAECOM