Navigate Up
Sign In
User Login


FEMA Leverages NOAA Water Level Data for CCAMP OPC Study Along California Coast
Nicole Metzger, Oceanographer and Justin Vandever, Coastal Engineer, BakerAECOM
Since 1854, the San Francisco tide station has recorded the rise and fall of the tides along the California coast. This station, and many others in California, continue to play an important role in ensuring safe navigation, understanding coastal oceanography, monitoring large-scale atmospheric-oceanic phenomena, measuring tsunami events, and tracking long-term sea level change. Water levels recorded at coastal tide stations represent the combined effects of mean sea level, astronomical tide fluctuations, storm surge, and other influences such as El Niño effects. As part of FEMA’s ongoing efforts to study coastal flood hazards along the California coastline, the agency has partnered with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to obtain comprehensive water level records from 15 long-term tide stations and many other short term stations within the study area. In collaboration with FEMA’s study contractor, BakerAECOM, the study team conducted a suite of water level analyses in support of the CCAMP OPC study, including determination of extreme stillwater elevations (SWEL) for mapping purposes and reconstruction of a 50-year record of hourly stillwater levels (SWL) for use in a response-based analysis of total water levels (TWL) at the shoreline, which includes calculation of wave setup and runup.
The first component of the onshore analyses of coastal processes is the determination of prescribed statistical water levels, such as the 1% and 0.2% annual chance SWELs. Currently, coastal studies that establish return period relationships for SWELs along the coast and inland bays use a technique referred to as the regional L-Moment method.  This statistical analysis tool combines data from multiple tide station records to develop estimates of extreme SWELs. The approach taken for the analysis was to first extract annual maximum water level values from observed tide station records. Using these data, multiple frequency distributions were tested to obtain the best fit to the data, and results were then compared to those of for adjacent tide stations along the coast and to group stations into “homogeneous regions.” Data from all tide stations within a homogenous region were then analyzed in a combined statistical analysis so that major flood events that were only experienced or recorded at some sites in the region would have an influence on the regional frequency curve. By combining data within a region, more robust estimates of extreme tide levels can be made than by independent site-specific analysis alone. Estimates of the following return period SWELs were made at each of the 15 long-term tide stations in the study area: 50-, 20-, 10-, 4-, 2-, 1-, and 0.2-percent annual chance. These estimates of extreme SWELs will then be applied spatially along the coast to specific shoreline reaches for mapping onto Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM).
The second component of the onshore analyses of coastal processes is the reconstruction of a 50-year hourly SWL record for use in the response-based analysis of TWLs at the shoreline. The hourly SWL values will be combined with the 50-year hindcast of nearshore wave conditions to estimate a complete 50-year TWL hindcast (from January 1, 1960 to December 31, 2009) at each wave analysis transect within the study area. The entire 50-year time series of wave, tide, and shoreline interactions is then statistically analyzed to determine the 1-percent annual chance TWL to establish Base Flood Elevations (BFE) for FIRM mapping. Since the majority of the tide station records along the California coast do not continuously span the 50-year hindcast period, a methodology was developed to fill temporal gaps in the tide station records based on comparisons with data records from adjacent stations.
The analysis was conducted by first deconstructing the observed water level records into their astronomical (“predicted”) and residual (“storm surge”) components. Correlations were then developed among all tide stations such that the missing residual component at one station could be estimated using the observed residual from a nearby station. The estimated residual at the station of interest was then combined with the predicted tide to provide the best estimate of the actual water level at the time of the data gap. Data gaps were filled at each of the long-term tide stations within the study area to provide comprehensive records of SWLs for use in subsequent analyses. The complete reconstructed hourly 50-year SWL records at each tide station were assigned to specific shoreline reaches for input to the TWL analysis.
Water level records provide the base input to any coastal flood study and the CCAMP OPC Study benefited greatly from FEMA’s partnership with NOAA to fulfill these two crucial analysis tasks. In addition to supporting the coastal flood hazard mapping as part of the current RiskMAP program, these data products will benefit other groups and agencies conducting work along the California coastline for years to come.

 Coastal Beat Story Archive

collapse Year : 2012 ‎(7)
<a href=''>Risk Map Local</a>
<a href=''>FEMA Leverages LiDAR</a>
<a href=''>FEMA’s CCAMP Studies and Our Coast, Our Future</a>
<a href=''>Region IX to Conduct First Flood Risk Review Meeting for CCAMP</a>
collapse Year : 2013 ‎(19)
<a href=''>FEMA Partners with Oceanweather and Scripps Institution of Oceanography to Bring Modeling Expertise to CCAMP OPC Study</a>
<a href=''>FEMA Region IX Holds Meetings for the California Coastal Analysis and Mapping Project / Open Pacific Coast Study</a>
<a href=''>Primary Frontal Dune Coastal High Hazard Area Mapping Requirements</a>
<a href=''>FEMA Holds South Bay Workshop to Kick-off Detailed Analysis in the South Bay Counties</a>
<a href=''>Translating Coastal Flood Hazard Modeling Results into Floodplain Mapping</a>
<a href=''>Terrain Modeling in FEMA’s California Coastal Flood Studies</a>
<a href=''>Join FEMA’s Community Rating System Program Using California’s Statewide Floodplain Management Activities</a>
<a href=''>Coastal Flood Processes Along the California Coast</a>
<a href=''>FEMA’s Annual Risk Awareness Survey: Findings from Previous Surveys and the Focus for the 2013 Survey</a>
collapse Year : 2014 ‎(9)
<a href=''>E386 Residential Coastal Construction</a>
<a href=''>Engaging Stakeholders to Help Communicate Impacts of BW-12</a>
<a href=''></a>
<a href=''>California Coastal Storm History Part Two – Ventura County</a>
<a href=''>Redelineation: What does it mean for me?</a>
collapse Year : 2015 ‎(2)
<a href=''>FEMA increases community access to draft floodplain mapping data </a>
collapse Year : 2016 ‎(6)
<a href=''></a>
1 - 40Next

 Other Stories

expand Arizona
Educating Maricopa County on the Power of Water,
Discovery Process, Thursday, February 23, 2012
expand California
Discovery Process, Thursday, March 1, 2012
NFIP Substantial Improvement and Substantial Damage Course, Wednesday, August 29, 2012
Santa Barbara County and Incorporated Areas Countywide Flood Insurance Rate Map,
Join FEMA’s Community Rating System Program Using California’s Statewide Floodplain Management Activities,
expand Coastal Studies
Discovery Process, Tuesday, January 10, 2012
Betty the Prepared Dog, Saturday, April 28, 2012
expand Hawaii
Tsunami: Learning from Experience in Hawaii,
Public Outreach Meeting for FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map, Wednesday, August 8, 2012
expand Nevada
Clark County Flood Facts,
expand Region Wide
Be Prepared for a Flooding Event in your Community Today!,
Watershed University , Friday, June 1, 2012
Know Your Line: Be Flood Aware, Thursday, May 2, 2013
1 - 30 Next
  • The Summary of Map Actions (SOMA) Report: SOMAs Deciphered

    Many community officials and floodplain managers are called upon to review a Summary of Map Actions (SOMA) report, but how familiar are you with this document, and the process of developing it? Did you know that the ability to revise or amend effective Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panels is always available? Revisions and amendments to flood hazard information may be accomplished through FEMA’s Letter of Map Change (LOMC) process, without having to re-publish the FIRM. When a Flood Insurance Study (FIS) update or restudy requires a revised FIRM panel to be re-published, the existing LOMCs that applied to the old effective FIRM panels are superseded by the newly effective FIRM panels, and LOMCs that have remained valid are revalidated. As part of a map revision, FEMA publishes a Preliminary and Final SOMA report. The SOMA records a complete list of all previously issued LOMCs, and their valid or superseded status, for each community affected by revised FIRM panels. The SOMA assists community officials in maintaining the most up-to-date information on their community’s FIRMs. (Read more…)

  • Flood Insurance Rate Maps and Flood Insurance Studies: From Preliminary to Effective

    ​FEMA flood hazard maps inform communities about the local flood risk. Flood hazard mapping is an important part of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), as FEMA regulatory products provide the basis for regulating development and determining flood insurance requirements under the NFIP regulations. FEMA maintains and updates regulatory flood hazard data through Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) and Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports.

    Following the data acquisition and data development phases of the flood insurance study process, FEMA distributes one set of the preliminary FIRM panels, the preliminary FIS Report, and the preliminary Summary of Map Actions (SOMA) to community CEOs. FEMA also posts PDF versions of the preliminary FIRM panels and FIS Report, as well as the DFIRM database containing the GIS shapefiles, to the Map Service Center (MSC), where they are available for public download. (The preliminary FIRM panels and the preliminary DFIRM database are archived on the MSC when the panels, FIS report, and database become effective.) The steps that follow, referred to as the post-preliminary process, include the public comment and appeal period, community and public meetings, the Letter of Final Determination, and community adoption/compliance requirements. 
    From July 2015 through November 2015, FEMA distributed preliminary data to ten coastal counties as part of the Open Pacific Coast Study and three counties as part of the San Francisco Bay Area Coastal Study. For more information about what goes into a flood map, go to this infographic on FEMA’s website. (Read more…)

View RSS feed

Powered by BakerAECOM